The queues¶
Open to anybody who can manage questions — a moderator, or the holder of a category grant. A grantee sees only their branches. An article with no category is moderators-only, because an article in no branch is in nobody's branch.
Six lists, each capped at 100, all drawn from articles that are not in the bin.
| Queue | Response key | An article is in it when |
|---|---|---|
| Waiting for review | awaiting_review |
status == "in_review" |
| Drafts | drafts |
status == "draft", most recently touched first |
| Generated but unread | machine_drafts |
status == "draft" and generated_by is set — a model wrote it and nobody has been back to it |
| Published without sources | published_without_references |
status != "draft" and references_json is empty |
| Published without questions | published_without_questions |
status == "published" and nothing in question_article_links points at it |
| Barely written | thin |
fewer than 2 sections — whatever its status |
Two of those criteria are broader than their names
Published without sources matches status != "draft", so an article
sitting in review with no references appears there too, not only a
published one.
Barely written ignores status entirely, so a two-line draft shows up in
both drafts and thin. That is deliberate — the queues are lenses, not
partitions, and one article can want a person's attention for two different
reasons.
Alongside the six lists the response carries counts — total, draft,
in_review, published, trashed — where trashed is a count of everything
in the bin. The bin is not one of the queues; it is reached from its own
page.
Reading the queues¶
They are ordered by what a person can do about them, not by urgency:
awaiting_reviewis somebody waiting on you.machine_draftsis work that exists but has never been judged.published_without_referencesandpublished_without_questionsare articles that are live and incomplete — visible to learners while missing the thing that makes them trustworthy or useful.thinis the pile of good intentions.